Post-Mortem: Difference between revisions

From Forecasting Wiki
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Banner|WIP}}
A post-mortem (in forecasting) is an analysis of a forecast, typically after it resolved. It is commonly used by professional forecasters<sup>[citation needed]</sup> to improve their reasoning for future forecasts.
A post-mortem (in forecasting) is an analysis of a forecast, typically after it resolved. It is commonly used by professional forecasters<sup>[citation needed]</sup> to improve their reasoning for future forecasts.


Line 14: Line 15:


* [[Pre-Mortem]]
* [[Pre-Mortem]]

[[Category:Stub]]
[[Category:Concepts]]

Latest revision as of 13:12, 10 June 2022

This article is work in progess. The author is working on it and it is not yet ready for review.

A post-mortem (in forecasting) is an analysis of a forecast, typically after it resolved. It is commonly used by professional forecasters[citation needed] to improve their reasoning for future forecasts.

Example[edit]

Consider, for example, two forecasts on whether X will be reelected:

  • Alice looks at recent polls, base rates for reelection, actuarial tables for people of X's demographic, unemployment numbers and energy prices as proxies for the public content, etc. and arrives at a 78% chance of X being reelected.
  • Bob checks social media and whether Mars is aligned with Saturn to arrive at a 1% chance of X being reelected.

Assume now that X ends up not getting reelected. Despite being "correct" Bob should not stop questioning his approach and Alice should not (completely) abandon hers. Alice should, however, start thinking about whether she could have done better. So Alice's post-mortem might consist of looking into questions like

See Also[edit]