Post-Mortem: Difference between revisions

From Forecasting Wiki
Content added Content deleted
m (added a heading)
mNo edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
* Did I consult a [[Biased Data|biased]] set of [[Polling|polls]]?
* Did I consult a [[Biased Data|biased]] set of [[Polling|polls]]?
* Did I rely too much on the [[Inside View|inside view]] or the [[Outside View|outside view]]?
* Did I rely too much on the [[Inside View|inside view]] or the [[Outside View|outside view]]?

=== See Also ===

* [[Pre-Mortem]]

Revision as of 16:38, 2 May 2022

A post-mortem (in forecasting) is an analysis of a forecast, typically after it resolved. It is commonly used by professional forecasters[citation needed] to improve their reasoning for future forecasts.

Example

Consider, for example, two forecasts on whether X will be reelected:

  • Alice looks at recent polls, base rates for reelection, actuarial tables for people of X's demographic, unemployment numbers and energy prices as proxies for the public content, etc. and arrives at a 78% chance of X being reelected.
  • Bob checks social media and whether Mars is aligned with Saturn to arrive at a 1% chance of X being reelected.

Assume now that X ends up not getting reelected. Despite being "correct" Bob should not stop questioning his approach and Alice should not (completely) abandon hers. Alice should, however, start thinking about whether she could have done better. So Alice's post-mortem might consist of looking into questions like

See Also